By and · Splitboarding.eu editorial team

Long approaches, varied snow and a board you deliberately want to drive: the Gnarnia Carbon puts the versatile freeride idea into a lighter build. It is relevant when you have a concrete reason to reduce total setup weight.

Is the Weston Gnarnia Carbon Splitboard 26/27 right for your tours?

For alpine splitters, the appeal is combining touring distance with a demanding descent. For mostly short powder approaches, balance the premium against suitable boots, bindings and skins. The standard Gnarnia remains a separate, valid choice.

What does the shape offer on the descent?

The brief stays directional, with moderate taper and a camber emphasis. Carbon changes the material tuning, not automatically the intended terrain. We have not ridden this current version ourselves and do not transfer Ridgeline or Riva scores to it.

What matters on the ascent?

Weston lists lightweight wood species, reinforcement around the inserts and Phantom connectors. On a traverse, the useful question remains whether your boots transmit pressure to the board. A lighter deck does not make poorly fitting bindings more precise.

How do you choose the right size?

Current sizes are 151, 158, 162 and 162W, a smaller selection than the standard model. The 162 and 162W allow a direct width comparison at the same length. Start with boot size and rider weight, then consider the handling you want.

How do boots, bindings and board work together?

Supportive boots and highbacks that transmit movement fit the stated purpose. Match stiffness to rider weight; maximum hardness is not a goal in itself. Count the carbon premium as part of the complete setup.

Plan the touring setup as a whole: a lighter board offers little benefit if your boot lacks support or excessive width makes every traverse tiring. Choose a suitable board for your descents, then match boots, highback and bindings. Skins also need the right length, width and attachments. Before the first tour, practise a complete transition at home with the actual components you will carry.

Read more about matching your equipment in our Splitboard Gear Guide.

Which of our test experiences help you choose?

We have not yet tested the Weston Gnarnia Carbon Splitboard ourselves. Our assessment uses manufacturer information and the principles in our Gear Guide. We do not assign our own riding scores to it.

On a demo we would use a suitable size and our own boots where possible. Check whether you can still apply pressure cleanly after a long ascent and whether the board feels as manageable in slow turns as on an open face. A firm traverse is particularly revealing about the match between boots, highback and board. A short piste demo cannot replace every aspect of touring experience, but it can reveal unsuitable width or an overly demanding setup early.

What has changed since the previous season and earlier models?

Weston identifies this version with 26/27. The current product page does not publish a complete list of technical changes from 25/26. A season label alone therefore establishes neither a new shape nor improved riding feel. Compare length, width, construction and hardware of the two actual boards. Moving between standard and carbon versions is a comparison of different builds as well as model years.

25/26 model page.

Which alternatives should you compare?

Compare Weston Gnarnia Splitboard and Weston Backwoods Carbon Splitboard. The differences in riding style and use are discussed above. A useful demo starts with comparable sizes, your own boots and a familiar stance. What matters is whether the board also suits you in tight terrain and after a long climb.

FAQ: What should you know before the first tour?

Is the Gnarnia Carbon just a more expensive graphic?

No. Weston specifies a different carbon construction and core plus its own hardware selection. Whether those differences justify the premium depends on touring distance, total weight and desired feel. We have not yet tested the current version ourselves.

How do I choose length and width?

Current sizes are 151, 158, 162 and 162W, a smaller selection than the standard model. The 162 and 162W allow a direct width comparison at the same length. Start with boot size and rider weight, then consider the handling you want.

Have you tested this board yourselves?

We have not yet tested the Weston Gnarnia Carbon Splitboard ourselves. This advice uses manufacturer information and our Gear Guide; we do not assign our own test scores to it.

How should I match boots and bindings to the board?

Supportive boots and highbacks that transmit movement fit the stated purpose. Match stiffness to rider weight; maximum hardness is not a goal in itself. Count the carbon premium as part of the complete setup.

What is included in the price and what else do you need?

Budget for suitable skins, bindings and the required interface. Check actual package contents so your price comparison includes the same parts.

What differs from the previous season?

Weston identifies this version with 26/27. The current product page does not publish a complete list of technical changes from 25/26. A season label alone therefore establishes neither a new shape nor improved riding feel. Compare length, width, construction and hardware of the two actual boards. Moving between standard and carbon versions is a comparison of different builds as well as model years.

Which sizes and specifications does the manufacturer list?

The table shows manufacturer specifications, not our own measurements. Sizes in the current model range: 151, 158, 162, 162W cm.

Size (cm)Effective Edge (cm)Waist Width (cm)Tip / Tail Width (cm)Taper (mm)Setback (mm)
15111524.629 / 28.1910
15812225.630.4 / 29.5920
16212526.231.0 / 30.1920
162W12527.332.2 / 31.3920
SizeSkin Selection
151Splitboard Skin 1
158Splitboard Skin 3
162Splitboard Skin 4
162WSplitboard Skin 5

Where do the information and images come from?

Weston Gnarnia Carbon Splitboard – manufacturer page. Checked 16 October 2026. Product photographs and size charts come from the manufacturer. Our own test experience is assigned to the ridden board in the test section.

What does the board look like? (4 photos)

Große Ansicht des Bildes