Fjell MT 1542s Splitboard

A less common board that left us smiling: the MT 1542s combines Fjell’s powder direction with clean carving. Its very good edge hold, composed ride and wide nose stood out in our test, especially when landings were less than perfect.

Is the Fjell MT 1542s Splitboard 26/27 right for your tours?

The Fjell MT 1542s is a stable, directional freeride splitboard for riders seeking clean carves, a composed ride and reliable float in a distinctive swallowtail shape.

Freeride splitters who enjoy using the edge without giving up float should add it to their comparison. A rockered nose, camber and a slightly narrower tail describe the approach. In our experience the edge tracked cleanly through turns without grabbing or hopping.

What should you consider on the ascent?

On the climb we felt stable and secure on the edge. Long traverses demanded a little more concentration than, for example, the Jones Solution or Amplid Metamorph. That comparison belongs to our test impressions rather than a universal result for every setup.

How do you choose suitable length and width?

The MT 1542s comes only in 160 cm, exactly the length we tested. Its waist measures 26.2 cm. Fjell lists a 60–100+ kg rider range and 2.7 kg board weight. The model number 1542 is not its board length. Check stance and boot fit for the actual 160 cm version.

How do boots, bindings and skins work together?

Start by matching boot fit, board width and lateral support. An oversized boot loses support before pressure reaches the edge. For the Fjell MT 1542s Splitboard, we would prioritise heel hold and a highback suited to your weight over choosing the stiffest possible binding. Playful downhill handling need not mean a setup that collapses sideways on a traverse. Practise both touring and riding modes with your actual interface and its specified screws. Plan suitable skins too: length, width and nose and tail fittings need to work together.

Read more in our Splitboard Gear Guide.

Which of our test experiences help you?

The MT 1542s impressed us with its controlled ride. Edge hold was very good, it tracked cleanly through turns and produced barely any chatter at speed. The tester was using a positive stance, so we cannot separate the board’s influence from the effect of that stance with certainty. What we can say is that the 160 felt stable and dependable in this setup.

The wide nose does more than create float. It also gave us extra confidence on jumps and natural terrain features when a landing was slightly off centre or the terrain kicked the board upwards unexpectedly. For a swallowtail, the MT 1542s loaded up surprisingly well and delivered useful pop. At 160 cm it is not exceptionally nimble, although it changed direction reasonably well for its length. Riders who prioritise very tight trees and instant direction changes should pay close attention to this during a demo.

In soft snow the wide nose floated well. The powder score of 85/100 reflects a promising initial impression; we want more powder days in different depths and on low-angle terrain before treating it as a final verdict. We scored it 85/100 for all-mountain riding, 80/100 for speed and 70/100 for freestyle. If you want an uncommon, stable freeride splitboard with a distinctive shape, it deserves a demo.

On the climb we felt stable and secure on the edge, including steeper and firmer traverses. On long traverses the tester felt more concentration was needed than with a Jones Solution or Amplid Metamorph. That is a personal comparison in particular setups, not a measured fixed performance gap.

The screw heads at the tail could be countersunk more cleanly. We could not establish that they interfered with either climbing or riding, however. Whether this shape could dispense with the tail clip entirely remains a design question rather than a recommendation to modify the board. The finishing score therefore remains 70/100. The notes give 83/100 for riding, 85/100 for agility and 80/100 for edge hold. The strong agility score describes the overall ride; within our test, the 160 still felt less nimble than a substantially shorter board. No numerical flex or weight score was supplied, so neither is invented. We tested the MT 1542s in 160 cm, its only offered length. Measured board weight and production year are undocumented. The specifications below come from the manufacturer.

What has changed since 25/26 and earlier models?

Fjell currently includes this model in its regular range. The manufacturer page does not identify a separate technical redesign for 26/27 or a complete change list from 25/26. This page is therefore our guide for the 26/27 season rather than a claim of a newly developed annual model. Compare the actual generation, length, width, hardware and package contents. A new graphic or different price alone does not establish changed tuning.

What is included in the price and what else do you need?

Fjell lists Union clips and hooks on the board. Include bindings and skins separately when planning the setup. Colour variants are grouped here because another topsheet or base colour is not an additional shape.

Which alternatives should you compare?

Compare Fjell MT 1180s Hokkaido Splitboard and Fjell MT 1365s Splitboard. The riding-style differences are discussed above. Use comparable sizes and your own boots on a demo where possible. A different stance or substantially softer binding can change more than a small dimensional difference between boards. Decide by how well the setup suits your usual tours.

FAQ: What should you know before the first tour?

What did we notice about finishing?

The screw heads at the tail could be countersunk more cleanly, although we could not establish that they interfered with climbing or riding. Whether this shape could dispense with the tail clip entirely remains a design question, not a recommendation to modify the board. Our finishing score is 70/100.

Which size and width suit me?

The MT 1542s comes only in 160 cm, exactly the length we tested. Its waist measures 26.2 cm. Fjell lists a 60–100+ kg rider range and 2.7 kg board weight. The model number 1542 is not its board length. Check stance and boot fit for the actual 160 cm version.

Have you tested this model yourselves?

Yes, we tested the MT 1542s in 160 cm, its only offered length. Our report and individual scores are included on this page.

Which boots, bindings and skins suit it?

Start by matching boot fit, board width and lateral support. An oversized boot loses support before pressure reaches the edge. For the Fjell MT 1542s Splitboard, we would prioritise heel hold and a highback suited to your weight over choosing the stiffest possible binding. Playful downhill handling need not mean a setup that collapses sideways on a traverse. Practise both touring and riding modes with your actual interface and its specified screws. Plan suitable skins too: length, width and nose and tail fittings need to work together.

What is included in the price and what else do you need?

Fjell lists Union clips and hooks on the board. Include bindings and skins separately when planning the setup. Colour variants are grouped here because another topsheet or base colour is not an additional shape.

What differs from the previous season?

Fjell currently includes this model in its regular range. The manufacturer page does not identify a separate technical redesign for 26/27 or a complete change list from 25/26. This page is therefore our guide for the 26/27 season rather than a claim of a newly developed annual model. Compare the actual generation, length, width, hardware and package contents. A new graphic or different price alone does not establish changed tuning.

Which sizes and specifications does the manufacturer list?

Sizes: 160 cm. These are manufacturer specifications, not our own measurements.

Where do the data, images and tests come from?

Fjell MT 1542s Splitboard – manufacturer page. Checked 19 October 2026. Product photographs and size charts come from the manufacturer. Our riding report uses the editorial test notes supplied for 26/27.